or search on
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The Elusive Search for Success: Defining and Measuring Implementation Outcomes in a Real-World Hospital Trial|
|Authors:||Shepherd H;Geerligs L;Butow P;Masya L;Shaw J;Price M;Dhillon H;Hack T;Girgis A;Luckett T;Lovell M;Kelly B;Beale P;Grimison P;Shaw T;Viney R;Rankin N|
|Categories:||Cancer Type - All Cancers combined|
|Journal Title:||Frontiers in Public Health|
|Abstract:||Objective and Study Setting: Research efforts to identify factors that influence successful implementation are growing. This paper describes methods of defining and measuring outcomes of implementation success, using a cluster randomized controlled trial with 12 cancer services in Australia comparing the effectiveness of implementation strategies to support adherence to the Australian Clinical Pathway for the Screening, Assessment and Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Cancer Patients (ADAPT CP). Study Design and Methods: Using the StaRI guidelines, a process evaluation was planned to explore participant experience of the ADAPT CP, resources and implementation strategies according to the Implementation Outcomes Framework. This study focused on identifying measurable outcome criteria, prior to data collection for the trial, which is currently in progress. Principal Findings: We translated each implementation outcome into clearly defined and measurable criteria, noting whether each addressed the ADAPT CP, resources or implementation strategies, or a combination of the three. A consensus process defined measures for the primary outcome (adherence) and secondary (implementation) outcomes; this process included literature review, discussion and clear measurement parameters. Based on our experience, we present an approach that could be used as a guide for other researchers and clinicians seeking to define success in their work. Conclusions: Defining and operationalizing success in real-world implementation yields a range of methodological challenges and complexities that may be overcome by iterative review and engagement with end users. A clear understanding of how outcomes are defined and measured, based on a strong theoretical framework, is crucial to meaningful measurement and outcomes. The conceptual approach described in this article could be generalized for use in other studies.|
|Division:||Cancer Research Division|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ResearchPubs are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
DSpace, Koha and Moodle hosting by Prosentient Systems