Search publications
Title: Validity over time of self-reported anthropometric variables during follow-up of a large cohort of UK women.
Authors: Wright, FL
Green, J
Reeves, G
Beral, V
Cairns, BJ
Canfell, K
Categories: Causes & Exposures - Diet & Exercise
Causes & Exposures - Genes
Population Groups - Women's Health
Projects & Studies - The Million Women Study
Pub. Date: Oct-2015
Journal Title: BMC Med Res Methodol.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: In prospective epidemiological studies, anthropometry is often self-reported and may be subject to reporting errors. Self-reported anthropometric data are reasonably accurate when compared with measurements made at the same time, but reporting errors and changes over time in anthropometric characteristics could potentially generate time-dependent biases in disease-exposure associations. METHODS: In a sample of about 4000 middle-aged UK women from a large prospective cohort study, we compared repeated self-reports of weight, height, derived body mass index, and waist and hip circumferences, obtained between 1999 and 2008, with clinical measurements taken in 2008. For self-reported and measured values of each variable, mean differences, correlation coefficients, and regression dilution ratios (which measure relative bias in estimates of linear association) were compared over time. RESULTS: For most variables, the differences between self-reported and measured values were small. On average, reported values tended to be lower than measured values (i.e. under-reported) for all variables except height; under-reporting was greatest for waist circumference. As expected, the greater the elapsed time between self-report and measurement, the larger the mean differences between them (each P < 0.001 for trend), and the weaker their correlations (each P < 0.004 for trend). Regression dilution ratios were in general close to 1.0 and did not vary greatly over time. CONCLUSION: Reporting errors in anthropometric variables may result in small biases to estimates of associations with disease outcomes. Weaker correlations between self-reported and measured values would result in some loss of study power over time. Overall, however, our results provide new evidence that self-reported anthropometric variables remain suitable for use in analyses of associations with disease outcomes in cohort studies over at least a decade of follow-up.
Division: Cancer Rsearch Division
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0075-1
URI: http://researchpubs.cancercouncil.com.au/cancercounciljspui/handle/1/1818
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.