or search on
|Title:||The advertised diet: an examination of the extent and nature of food advertising on Australian television|
|Authors:||Roberts M; Pettigrew S; Chapman K; Quester P; Miller C|
|Categories:||Etiology - Exogenous Factors in the Origin and Cause of Cancer|
Prevention - Interventions to Prevent Cancer: Personal Behaviours (Non-Dietary) that Affect Cancer Risk
Cancer Control, Survivorship, and Outcomes Research - Education and Communication Research
|Keywords:||Advertising as Topic; Humans; Marketing; methods; Policy; Restaurants; Social Marketing; statistics & numerical data; Television; Vegetables; Australia; Beverages; Cities; Data Collection; Diet; Fast Foods; Food; Fruit|
|Journal Title:||Health Promotion Journal of Australia|
|Page number start:||137|
|Page number end:||142|
|Abstract:||ISSUES ADDRESSED: The aim of the present study was to describe food advertising and expenditure on Australian television, and to conduct an audit to assess what proportion of food and beverage television advertisements was consistent with dietary recommendations. METHODS: Data were acquired from a national media monitoring company for advertisements broadcast in five major Australian cities from 1 September 2010 to 31 October 2010. Content analysis was undertaken on these advertisements and the advertised foods were assessed against the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. The data also included advertising expenditures. RESULTS: Most advertised foods were non-core foods (63%), with few advertisements for fruits and vegetables (6%). Advertisements for non-core foods were significantly more frequent during prime time viewing periods (71% vs 60%; P<0.01). High levels of advertising for fast food (28%) and non-core beverages (24%) were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that the foods advertised during the data-collection period were inconsistent with the recommended diet. There are clear areas for policy concern given that the majority of recorded advertisements were for foods classified as 'occasional foods', there were low levels of advertising for fruit and vegetables, and there were no social marketing messages to support healthy eating. SO WHAT? The findings of the study suggest that there is an urgent need for more comprehensive regulation of food advertising in Australia|
|Division:||Cancer Research Division|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.