Search publications
Title: Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study
Authors: Goldsbury DE; Armstrong K; Simonella L; Armstrong BK; O'Connell DL
Categories: Cancer Type - Bowel & Colorectal Cancer
Cancer Type - Lung Cancer
Cancer Control, Survivorship, and Outcomes Research - Resources and Infrastructure
Keywords: Australia; Other; Patterns of care; radiotherapy; Registries; Research; Sensitivity and Specificity; surgery; Wales; cancer; cancer registry; colorectal cancer; Comorbidity; Data Collection; Lung; methods; New South Wales
Year: 2012
Journal Title: BMC Health Services Research
Volume: 12
Page number start: 387
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Monitoring treatment patterns is crucial to improving cancer patient care. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of linked routinely collected administrative health data for monitoring colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. METHODS: Colorectal and lung cancer cases diagnosed in NSW between 2000 and 2002 were identified from the NSW Central Cancer Registry (CCR) and linked to their hospital discharge records in the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection (APDC). These records were then linked to data from two relevant population-based patterns of care surveys. The main outcome measures were the sensitivity and specificity of data from the CCR and APDC for disease staging, investigative procedures, curative surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and selected comorbidities. RESULTS: Data for 2917 colorectal and 1580 lung cancer cases were analysed. Unknown disease stage was more common for lung cancer in the administrative data (18%) than in the survey (2%). Colonoscopies were captured reasonably accurately in the administrative data compared with the surveys (82% and 79% respectively; 91% sensitivity, 53% specificity) but all other colorectal or lung cancer diagnostic procedures were under-enumerated. Ninety-one percent of colorectal cancer cases had potentially curative surgery recorded in the administrative data compared to 95% in the survey (96% sensitivity, 92% specificity), with similar accuracy for lung cancer (16% and 17%; 92% sensitivity, 99% specificity). Chemotherapy (~40% sensitivity) and radiotherapy (sensitivity</=30%) were vastly under-enumerated in the administrative data. The only comorbidity that was recorded reasonably accurately in the administrative data was diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Linked routinely collected administrative health data provided reasonably accurate information on potentially curative surgical treatment, colonoscopies and comorbidities such as diabetes. Other diagnostic procedures, comorbidities, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not well enumerated in the administrative data. Other sources of data will be required to comprehensively monitor the primary management of cancer patients
Programme: Health Services Research
Division: Cancer Research Division
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-387
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.